The accusations are shattering Washington’s last illusions.
Newly released FBI interview summaries now claim Adam Schiff greenlit leaks of classified Trump–Russia material to politically wound a sitting president. A whistleblower says it wasn’t an accident. It was a plan. A mission to “indict President TRUMP” in the court of public opinion. Careers, elections, and the truth itself may have been on the li… Continues…
If accurate, the FBI interview summaries paint a picture of a powerful committee weaponized for partisan ends, blurring the line between oversight and political warfare. The whistleblower, a former Democratic intelligence officer, describes an operation in which “derogatory” intelligence about Donald Trump was not simply reviewed, but allegedly prepared for selective leaking. Eric Swalwell is cast as a likely conduit, even as he dismisses the claims as baseless and politically tainted.
The story widens as it reaches the media. Paul Sperry’s reporting raises the possibility that sensitive committee material funneled toward Washington Post reporter Ellen Nakashima, shaping some of the most consequential Trump–Russia headlines of the era. Whether these allegations result in formal investigations or fade into partisan noise, they reopen a raw question: how much of the “Russiagate” narrative was investigation, and how much was orchestrated perception?